1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Raymond Limited (the ‘Company’), which comprise the Standalone Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2025, the Standalone Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Standalone Statement of Cash Flow and the Standalone Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and notes to the standalone financial statements, including material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.
2. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (the ‘Act’) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards (‘Ind AS’) specified under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 (as amended) and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2025, and its profit (including other comprehensive income - gain), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.
Basis for Opinion
3. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics issued by the ICAI. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter - Demerger of lifestyle business undertaking
4. We draw attention to note 40(a) to the accompanying standalone financial statements which describes that pursuant to the scheme of arrangement (the ‘Scheme’) between the Company, Raymond Lifestyle Limited (formerly known as Raymond Consumer Care Limited) (‘Resulting Company’ or ‘Transferee Company’), Ray Global Consumer Trading Limited (‘Transferor Company’)
and their respective shareholders, as approved by the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal and filed with respective Registrar of Companies, the Lifestyle Business Undertaking of the Company was demerged and transferred to Resulting Company with effect from 30 June 2024. The said demerger was given accounting effect in the year ended 31 March 2025 from the effective date in accordance with Appendix A to Ind AS 10 “Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners” (‘Ind AS 10’) and Ind AS 105 “Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations” ('Ind AS 105’). Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Emphasis of Matter - Demerger of real estate business
undertaking
5. We draw attention to note 40(b) to the accompanying standalone financial statements which describes that pursuant to the scheme of arrangement (the ‘Scheme’) between the Company (‘Demerged Company’), Raymond Realty Limited (‘Resulting Company’) and their respective shareholders, as approved by the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench and filed with respective Registrar of Companies, the Real Estate Business Undertaking of the Company has been demerged and transferred to Resulting Company with effect from 01 May 2025. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities as at 31 March 2025 related to Real Estate Business Undertaking have been classified as “held for distribution” and the net results of Real Estate Business Undertaking for the current and comparative year have been disclosed separately as discontinued operations in the accompanying standalone financial statements, in accordance with Ind AS 105. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
KEY AUDIT MATTERS
6. Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the standalone financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
7. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
Key audit matters
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matters
|
Impairment testing of investment in and other receivables
|
Our
|
procedures included, but were not limited to the
|
from a joint venture
|
following:
|
Refer note 1(b)(D)(x) for Company’s material accounting policy
|
•
|
Obtained an understanding of management’s process,
|
information on impairment. Also refer notes 5, 14 and 15 for
|
|
evaluated design and tested the operating effectiveness of
|
details of investment and other receivables from Raymond UCO
|
|
controls around impairment and recoverability assessment
|
Denim Private Limited (the 'joint venture’/'Raymond UCO’),
|
|
as per Ind AS 36 and Ind AS 109;
|
including its credit risk assessment, in the accompanying
|
•
|
Evaluated the Company’s accounting policies with respect
|
standalone financial statements.
|
|
to impairment/ credit risk assessment and assessed its
|
As at 31 March 2025, the carrying amount of investment
|
|
compliance with the requirements of Ind AS 36 and Ind AS
|
in Raymond UCO is Rs. 14,956 lakhs (net of provision for
|
|
109;
|
diminution in the value of investment of Rs. 20,950 lakhs).
|
•
|
Obtained and reviewed valuation report as prepared by
|
Further, as at such date, the Company has loans, interest and
|
|
management experts for determination of recoverable
|
other receivables aggregating Rs. 3,424 lakhs from the joint
|
|
value of investment in the joint venture and also assessed
|
venture.
|
|
the appropriateness of methodology, valuation model and
|
In accordance with the requirements of Ind AS 36 “Impairment
|
|
key assumptions used by the management experts;
|
of Assets” ('Ind AS 36’) and Ind AS 109 “Financial instruments”
|
•
|
Assessed the professional competence, objectivity and
|
('Ind AS 109’), management has assessed that the losses
|
|
capabilities of management valuation specialist;
|
suffered by the joint venture over the years indicate
|
•
|
Performed inquiries and evaluated whether management’s
|
impairment in the carrying values of the aforementioned
|
|
assumptions such as future cash flows, growth rates,
|
balances. Accordingly, the management has performed
|
|
discount rates, terminal growth rate etc., as used in cash
|
impairment assessment and has estimated the recoverable
|
|
flow projections are reasonable by understanding the
|
amount of its investment and other receivables in the joint
|
|
historical performance, approved business plans for the
|
venture using, inter alia, 'Discounted Cash Flow valuation
|
|
joint venture and our understanding of the business and
|
model’, which is inherently complex and involves the use of
|
|
comparable companies;
|
significant management estimates and assumptions such as, projections of future cash flows, growth rates, discount rates, terminal growth rate, expected future market and economic conditions etc.
|
•
|
Considering the inherent subjectivity involved in the future cash flow projections, we assessed the valuation of the joint venture independently based on assumptions relating to revenue growth rate noted for comparable companies with
|
As per such assessment carried out by the management, the
|
|
the help of auditor’s valuation specialists and performed
|
carrying value of the investment has been impaired by Rs.
|
|
sensitivity analysis; and
|
3,250 lakhs in the current year, as disclosed in note 5(ii) to the accompanying standalone financial statements.
Considering the materiality of the carrying value of aforementioned balances, significant management judgement required in estimating the quantum of impairment in the value of these balances and such estimates and judgements being inherently subjective, and this matter requiring frequent discussions with those charged with governance, we have identified this as a key audit matter for the current year audit.
|
•
|
Ensured the appropriateness and adequacy of presentation and disclosures as enumerated in Ind AS.
|
Revenue recognition from real estate project under
|
Our procedures included, but were not limited to the following:
|
development
|
•
|
Evaluated the appropriateness of the Company’s
|
Refer notes 1(b)(D)(xvi) and 40(b) to the standalone financial
|
|
accounting policy for revenue recognition from real estate
|
statements for material accounting policy information and related disclosures.
|
|
projects in terms of principles enunciated under Ind AS 115;
|
Key audit matters
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matters
|
Revenue recognised from real estate project under
|
•
|
Obtained an understanding of the management’s
|
development ('construction project’) during the year ended 31
|
|
processes and evaluated the design and tested operating
|
March 2025 amounts to Rs. 175,472 lakhs.
|
|
effectiveness of controls over the revenue recognition from
|
In accordance with Ind AS 115 “Revenue from Contracts
|
|
construction projects and estimation of total costs;
|
with Customers” ('Ind AS 115’), the Company has assessed
|
•
|
Evaluated the appropriateness of the management’s
|
and concluded that its performance obligations arising from
|
|
assessment that the performance obligations arising from
|
the construction project satisfy the criteria for recognition
|
|
the construction project satisfy the criteria for revenue
|
of revenue over the period of time. Accordingly, revenue
|
|
recognition over time, in accordance with Ind AS 115;
|
is recognised using a percentage of completion method
|
•
|
On a sample basis, compared revenue transactions
|
computed as per the input method.
|
|
recorded during the year with the underlying agreements
|
We focused on this area because significant management
|
|
and invoices raised on customers;
|
judgments and estimates are applied in:
|
•
|
Assessed the reasonableness of key inputs and
|
> determining whether the criteria for satisfaction of
|
|
assumptions used in the estimation of total contract costs;
|
performance obligation and recognition of revenue over
|
•
|
Examined costs included within work-in-progress balances
|
the period of time in accordance with Ind AS 115 was
|
|
on a sample basis by verifying supporting documents
|
met;
|
|
such as underlying invoices and signed work orders and
|
> estimating total contract costs of the construction
|
|
further compared it with the budgeted costs to determine
|
project, including contingencies that could arise from
|
|
percentage of completion of project as applied for revenue
|
variations to the original contract terms; and
|
|
recognition;
|
> estimating the proportion of contract work completed
|
•
|
Tested the mathematical accuracy of the underlying
|
for the construction project which requires estimates in
|
|
calculations; and
|
relation to forecasting contract revenue and total costs.
|
•
|
Ensured the appropriateness, completeness and adequacy
|
The estimates of various contract-related costs and revenue
|
|
of presentation and disclosure requirements as enumerated
|
can be potentially impacted on account of various factors
|
|
in Ind AS.
|
and differ from the actual outcomes. The changes in these
|
|
|
judgements and the related estimates as contracts progress
|
|
|
can result in material adjustments to revenue recognised
|
|
|
during the year and margins.
|
|
|
Considering the materiality of the amounts involved, and the
|
|
|
significant judgements applied in determining the appropriate
|
|
|
accounting treatment as mentioned above, this matter
|
|
|
required significant auditor’s attention and therefore, has been
|
|
|
identified as a key audit matter for the current year audit.
|
|
|
Cybersecurity incident related to financial reporting
|
Our procedures included, but were not limited to the following:
|
Information Technology (IT) systems
|
•
|
Assessed the impact of the cybersecurity incident on the
|
Refer note 49 to the accompanying standalone financial
|
|
Company’s financial reporting IT environment, including
|
statements for disclosure with respect to the cybersecurity
|
|
data security, and the effectiveness of internal financial
|
incident.
|
|
controls;
|
During the current year, the Company had identified a
|
•
|
Obtained and reviewed the reports of the external IT
|
ransomware attack within its IT network that affected its
|
|
consultants, engaged by management to understand
|
financial reporting IT systems and operations and caused a
|
|
the cause of the incident and its impact on Company’s IT
|
temporary interruption of system operations from 11 February
|
|
infrastructure, including financial systems.
|
2025 to 16 February 2025. The Company is significantly
|
•
|
With the assistance of auditor’s IT and cyber incident
|
dependent on its financial reporting IT systems for processing
|
|
response specialists, we evaluated the actions taken by
|
information and financial data that support the overall
|
|
the management in response to the cybersecurity incident,
|
preparation of the standalone financial statements.
|
|
performed procedures to evaluate management’s
|
Key audit matters
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matters
|
In response, management promptly initiated containment,
|
•
|
Assessed management’s evaluation and conclusions with
|
evaluation, restoration, and remediation measures, with
|
|
respect to compliance with applicable laws and regulations
|
the assistance of external cybersecurity and IT specialists
|
|
and inquired with Company’s internal IT and compliance
|
including implementation of necessary alternate controls and
|
|
teams to corroborate management’s assessment;
|
manual reconstruction of financial data for the interrupted
|
•
|
With the assistance of auditor’s IT specialists, we tested
|
period.
|
|
Company’s IT general controls and IT automated controls
|
Following the completion of the aforesaid remediation
|
|
for undisrupted periods;
|
activities, the Company has assessed and concluded that the
|
•
|
With respect to manual data reconstruction approach
|
incident did not impact the accuracy and completeness of the
|
|
adopted by the management, we performed the following
|
financial information.
|
|
procedures, amongst others, to ensure the completeness
|
This incident necessitated significant auditor effort, including
|
|
and accuracy of data restored:
|
involvement of professionals with expertise in cyber incident
|
|
> Obtained an understanding of process followed by
|
response and IT, and significant auditor’s professional
|
|
the management in consultation with management’s
|
judgements were involved in designing the audit procedures
|
|
cyber and IT specialists for manual reconstruction of
|
and evaluating the management’s response on potential
|
|
data and performed walkthrough of such process;
|
extent and consequences of the cybersecurity incident on the Company’s financial reporting IT environment and controls and manual data reconstruction approach adopted by the management. Accordingly, we have identified the cybersecurity incident as a key audit matter for the current year audit.
|
|
> For the period of data loss where manual controls were implemented by the management and data was restored from alternative backups, performed reconciliations and tested additional samples on test check basis for ascertaining the accuracy and completeness of transactions in such period, with support of IT specialist as required.
|
|
•
|
We assessed whether the disclosures made by management in the standalone financial statements are appropriate and adequate
|
Business combination - Demerger of lifestyle business undertaking
Refer note 1(b)(D)(xxi) and 1(b)(D)(xxii) for Company’s material accounting policy information on asset held for sale/ distribution and discontinued operations and note 40(a) for details of demerger and related disclosures in the accompanying standalone financial statements.
During the current year, the Company’s lifestyle business undertaking was demerged into Raymond Lifestyle Limited on a going concern basis, pursuant to composite scheme of arrangement (the ‘Scheme’) with effect from 30 June 2024 being the date of filing of certified order of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) with Registrar of Companies (ROC). Pursuant to the Scheme, the Company has transferred net liability of Rs. 26,376 lakhs, recognised dividend payable of Rs. 851,600 lakhs at fair value and recorded gain on demerger as an exceptional item of Rs. 877,976 lakhs (net of transaction cost and income tax on transaction cost), in accordance with Appendix A to Ind AS 10 and Ind AS 105.
Determination of fair value for recognition of dividend payable involved fair valuation of transferred assets and liabilities and significant assumptions around growth rate, terminal growth rate, discounting factor etc
Our procedures included, but were not limited to the following:
Ý Evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of key internal financial controls relating to recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosures in respect to aforementioned Scheme;
Ý Read the NCLT order dated 21 June 2024 approving the Scheme and verified the subsequent filing of the order with ROC on 30 June 2024 to understand the key terms and conditions;
Ý Evaluated the appropriateness of the accounting treatment prescribed in the Scheme and with the applicable accounting standards including the management judgements involved, for ascertaining whether the demerger is a common control transaction or non-common control transaction;
Ý Obtained and tested the management’s working for identifying the assets and liabilities transferred including accuracy of amounts as on the effective date;
Ý Obtained and reviewed valuation report as prepared by management expert for determination of fair value of assets transferred. Also, assessed the professional competence, objectivity and capabilities of the valuation specialist engaged by the management;
Key audit matters
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matters
|
We have identified this matter as a key audit matter due to its
|
•
|
With assistance of auditor’s valuation experts, evaluated the
|
pervasive impact on Company’s overall financial statements
|
|
valuation methodology and tested significant assumptions
|
including the presentation and disclosures, significant
|
|
and judgments applied by the management in fair valuation
|
auditor’s judgements being involved to test underlying
|
|
of the lifestyle business undertaking, including performance
|
management’s assumptions and judgements in relation to
|
|
of sensitivity analysis on key inputs such as growth rate,
|
assessment of control, accounting the Scheme under Ind AS
|
|
discounting factor, terminal growth rate etc.; and
|
10, identification of assets and liabilities to be transferred as
|
•
|
Ensured the appropriateness of measurement principles
|
per the Scheme, determination of fair values of transferred
|
|
and completeness and adequacy of presentation and
|
assets and liabilities.
|
|
disclosure requirements as enumerated in Ind AS.
|
The above matter is also considered fundamental to the
|
|
|
understanding of the users of the accompanying standalone
|
|
|
financial statements
|
|
|
8. The Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Annual Report is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditor’s report.
Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
When we read the Annual Report, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with
Governance for the Standalone Financial Statements
9. The accompanying standalone financial statements have been approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation and presentation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act and other accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting
policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
10. In preparing the standalone financial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
11. The Board of Directors is also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone
Financial Statements
12. Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Standards on Auditing will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone financial statements.
13. As part of an audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing, specified under section 143(10) of the Act, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Act, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls with reference to standalone financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls;
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management;
• Conclude on the appropriateness of Board of Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the standalone financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern; and
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the standalone financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the standalone financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
14. We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
15. We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
16. From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
17. As required by section 197(16) of the Act, based on our audit, we report that the Company has paid remuneration to its directors during the year in accordance with the provisions of and limits laid down under section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.
18. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 (the ‘Order’) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 143(11) of the Act, we give in Annexure - I, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.
19. Further to our comments in Annexure - I, as required by section 143(3) of the Act based on our audit, we report, to the extent applicable, that:
a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit of the accompanying standalone financial statements;
b) Except for the matters stated in paragraph 19(h) (vi) below on reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law relating to preparation of the aforesaid standalone financial statements have been kept so far as it appears from our examination of those books. Further, the back-up of the books of account and other books and papers of the Company maintained in electronic mode has been maintained on servers physically located in India, on a daily basis, except during the period of cybersecurity incident as further explained in note 49 to the accompanying standalone financial statements;
c) The standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act;
e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board
of Directors of the Company, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2025 from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164(2) of the Act;
f) The reservation relating to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith are as stated in paragraph 19(b) above on reporting under section 143(3)(b) of the Act and paragraph 19(h)(vi) below on reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended);
g) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to standalone financial statements of the Company as on 31 March 2025 and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report in Annexure - II, wherein we have expressed an unmodified opinion; and
h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position as at 31 March 2025;
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses as at 31 March 2025;
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company during the year ended 31 March 2025;
iv.
a. The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in note 52(f) to the standalone financial statements, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or securities premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any persons or entities, including foreign entities (the 'intermediaries’), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or
on behalf of the Company (the 'Ultimate Beneficiaries’) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf the Ultimate Beneficiaries;
b. The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in note 52(f) to the standalone financial statements, no funds have been received by the Company from any persons or entities, including foreign entities (the 'Funding Parties’), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party ('Ultimate Beneficiaries’) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries; and
c. Based on such audit procedures performed as considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the management representations under sub-clauses (a) and (b) above contain any material misstatement.
v. The final dividend paid by the Company during the year ended 31 March 2025 in respect of such dividend declared for the previous year is in accordance with section 123 of the Act to the extent it applies to payment of dividend.
vi. As stated in note 50 to the standalone financial statements and based on our examination which included test checks, except for instance mentioned below, the Company in respect of financial year commencing on 1 April 2024, has used accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same has been operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software. Further, during the course of our audit, we did not come across any instance of audit trail feature being tampered with other than the consequential impact of the exception given below. Furthermore, other
than the consequential impact of the exceptions below, the audit trail has been preserved by the Company as per the statutory requirements for record retention where such feature was enabled.
Nature of exception noted
|
Details of exception
|
|
Instances of accounting software for maintaining
|
The audit trail feature was not enabled at the database
|
books of account for which the feature of recording
|
level for accounting software to
|
log any direct data
|
audit trail (edit log) facility was not operated throughout
|
changes, used for maintenance
|
of all accounting
|
the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software
|
records by the Company
|
|
For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP
Chartered Accountants Firm’s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
Bharat Shetty
Partner
Membership No.: 106815 UDIN: 25106815BMJIFN9327
Place: Mumbai Date: 12 May 2025
|