(x) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event; it is probable that the Company will be required to settle the obligation; and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. When the effect of the time value of money is material,
provision is measured at the present value of cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation. When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, a receivable is recognised as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably. Provisions are reviewed at each balance sheet date.
(xi) Employee benefits
(a) Post-employment obligations
The Company operates the following post¬ employment schemes:
• defined benefit plans towards payment of gratuity; and
• defined contribution plans towards employees' provident fund & employee pension scheme, employees' state insurance, superannuation scheme and national pension scheme.
Defined benefit plan
The liability or asset recognised in the balance sheet in respect of the defined benefit plan is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period less the fair value of plan assets. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined using projected unit credit method by discounting the estimated future cash outflows with reference to market yield at the end of the reporting period on government bonds that have maturity terms approximating the estimated term of the related obligation, through actuarial valuations carried out at the end of each annual reporting period.
The net interest cost is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net balance of the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets. Such net interest cost along with the current service cost and, if applicable, the past service cost and settlement gain/loss, is included in employee benefit expense in the statement of profit and loss. Remeasurement gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions, comprising actuarial gains/losses and return on plan assets (excluding the amount recognised in net interest on the net defined liability), are recognised in the period
in which they occur, directly in other comprehensive income. They are included in retained earnings in the statement of changes in equity and in the balance sheet.
(b) Other long-term employee benefit obligations
Other long-term employee benefits include earned leaves and sick leaves. The liabilities for earned leaves and sick leaves are not expected to be settled wholly within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service. They are therefore measured at the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the end of the reporting period using the projected unit credit method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at the end of each annual reporting period. The benefits are discounted using the market yield on government bonds at the end of the reporting period that have maturity term approximating to the estimated term of the related obligation. Remeasurements as a result of experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are recognised in profit or loss. The obligations are presented as provisions in the balance sheet.
(xii) Financial assets
(a) Classification
The Company classifies its financial assets in the following measurement categories:
• those to be measured subsequently at fair value (either through other comprehensive income, or through profit or loss), and
• those measured at amortised cost.
The classification depends on the Company's business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the cash flows.
For assets measured at fair value, gains and losses will either be recorded in profit or loss or other comprehensive income. For assets in the nature of debt instruments, this will depend on the business model. For assets in the nature of equity instruments, this will depend on whether the Company has made an irrevocable election at the time of initial recognition
to account for the equity instrument at fair value through other comprehensive income.
The Company reclassifies debt instruments when and only when its business model for managing those assets changes.
(b) Measurement
At initial recognition, the Company measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are expensed in profit or loss.
Debt instruments
Subsequent measurement of debt instruments depends on the Company's business model for managing the asset and the cash flow characteristics of the asset. There are three measurement categories into which the Company classifies its debt instruments:
• Amortised cost: Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest are measured at amortised cost. A gain or loss on a debt investment that is subsequently measured at amortised cost is recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised or impaired. Interest income from these financial assets is recognised using the effective interest rate method.
• Fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI): Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows and for selling the financial assets, where the assets' cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest, are measured at FVTOCI. Movements in the carrying amount are taken through OCI, except for the recognition of impairment gains or losses, interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses which are recognised in profit or loss. When the financial asset is derecognised, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in OCI is reclassified
from equity to profit or loss and recognised in other gains/(losses). Interest income from these financial assets is included in other income using the effective interest rate method.
• Fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL):
Assets that do not meet the criteria for amortised cost or FVTOCI are measured at fair value through profit or loss. A gain or loss on a debt investment that is subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in profit or loss and presented net in the statement of profit and loss within other gains/(losses) in the period in which it arises. Interest income from these financial assets is included in other income.
Equity instruments
The Company subsequently measures all equity investments at fair value, except for equity investments in subsidiaries and joint venture where the Company has the option to either measure it at cost or fair value. The Company has opted to measure equity investments in subsidiaries and joint venture at cost hence investments in subsidiaries and joint venture are carried at cost less impairment, if any. Where the Company's management has elected to present fair value gains and losses on equity investments in other comprehensive income, there is no subsequent reclassification of fair value gains and losses to profit or loss. Dividends from such investments are recognised in profit or loss as other income when the Company's right to receive payments is established.
(c) Impairment of financial assets
In accordance with Ind AS 109 Financial Instruments, the Company applies expected credit loss (ECL) model for measurement and recognition of impairment loss associated with its financial assets carried at amortised cost and FVTOCI debt instruments.
For trade receivables or any contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset that result from transactions that are within the scope of Ind AS 115 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the Company applies simplified approach permitted by Ind AS 109 Financial Instruments, which requires expected life time losses to be recognised after
initial recognition of receivables. For recognition of impairment loss on other financial assets and risk exposure, the Company determines whether there has been a significant increase in the credit risk since initial recognition. If credit risk has not increased significantly, twelve months ECL is used to provide for impairment loss. However, if credit risk has increased significantly, lifetime ECL is used. If, in a subsequent period, credit quality of the instrument improves such that there is no longer a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, then the entity reverts to recognising impairment loss allowance based on twelve-months ECL.
ECL represents expected credit loss resulting from all possible defaults and is the difference between all contractual cash flows that are due to the Company in accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the entity expects to receive, discounted at the original effective interest rate. While determining cash flows, cash flows from the sale of collateral held or other credit enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms are also considered.
ECL is determined with reference to historically observed default rates over the expected life of the trade receivables and is adjusted for forward looking estimates. Note 41 (i) details how the Company determines expected credit loss.
(d) Derecognition of financial assets
A financial asset is derecognised only when the Company
• has transferred the rights to receive cash flows from the financial asset; or
• retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of the financial asset, but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to one or more recipients.
Where the Company has transferred an asset, it evaluates whether it has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset. In such cases, the financial asset is derecognised. Where the Company has not transferred substantially
all risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset, the financial asset is not derecognised.
Where the Company has neither transferred a financial asset nor retained substantially all risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset, the financial asset is derecognised if the Company has not retained control of the financial asset. Where the Company retains control of the financial asset, the asset is continued to be recognised to the extent of continuing involvement in the financial asset.
On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable and the cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity is recognised in profit or loss if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in profit or loss on disposal of that financial asset.
On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety, the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial asset between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement, and the part it no longer recognises on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts on the date of the transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognised and the sum of the consideration received for the part no longer recognised and any cumulative gain or loss allocated to it that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in profit or loss if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in profit or loss on disposal of that financial asset. A cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts.
(e) Effective interest method
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a debt instrument and of allocating interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts
through the expected life of the financial asset to the gross carrying amount of a financial asset. When calculating the effective interest rate, the Company estimates the expected cash flows by considering all the contractual terms of the financial instrument but does not consider the expected credit losses. Income is recognised on an effective interest basis for debt instruments other than those financial assets classified as at FVTPL.
(xiii)Financial liabilities and equity instruments
(a) Classification
Debt and equity instruments issued by the Company are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument.
Equity instruments
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities.
Financial liabilities
The Company classifies its financial liabilities in the following measurement categories:
• those to be measured subsequently at fair value through profit or loss, and
• those measured at amortised cost.
Financial liabilities are classified as at FVTPL when the financial liability is held for trading or it is designated as at FVTPL, other financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost at the end of subsequent accounting periods.
(b) Measurement Equity instruments
Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognised at the proceeds received. Transaction cost of equity transactions shall be accounted for as a deduction from equity.
Financial liabilities
At initial recognition, the Company measures a financial liability at its fair value net of, in the case of
a financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability. Transaction costs of financial liability carried at fair value through profit or loss are expensed in profit or loss.
Subsequent measurement of financial liabilities depends on the classification of financial liabilities. There are two measurement categories into which the Company classifies its financial liabilities:
• Fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL):
Financial liabilities are classified as at FVTPL when the financial liability is held for trading or it is designated as at FVTPL. Financial liabilities at FVTPL are stated at fair value, with any gains or losses arising on remeasurement recognised in profit or loss.
• Amortised cost: Financial liabilities that are not held-for-trading and are not designated as at FVTPL are measured at amortised cost at the end of subsequent accounting periods. The carrying amounts of financial liabilities that are subsequently measured at amortised cost are determined based on the effective interest method. Interest expense that is not capitalised as part of costs of an asset is included in the ‘Finance costs' line item.
(c) Derecognition
Equity instruments
Repurchase of the Company's own equity instruments is recognised and deducted directly in equity. No gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the Company's own equity instruments.
Financial liabilities
The Company derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Company's obligations are discharged, cancelled or have expired. An exchange with a lender of debt instruments with substantially different terms is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability. Similarly, a substantial modification of the terms of an existing financial liability (whether or not attributable to the
financial difficulty of the debtor) is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability derecognised and the consideration paid and payable is recognised in profit or loss.
(d) Effective interest method
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability to the gross carrying amount of a financial liability.
(e) Foreign exchange gains and losses
For financial liabilities that are denominated in a foreign currency and are measured at amortised cost at the end of each reporting period, the foreign exchange gains and losses are determined based on the amortised cost of the instruments and are recognised in ‘Other income'. The fair value of financial liabilities denominated in a foreign currency is determined in that foreign currency and translated at the spot rate at the end of the reporting period.
(xiv)Derivatives and hedging activities
The Company undertakes transactions involving derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign exchange forward contracts, to manage its exposure to foreign exchange risks.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date the relevant contracts are entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value at the end of each reporting period. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedge, in which event the timing of the recognition in profit or loss depends on the nature of the hedging relationship and the nature of the hedged item.
Fair value hedges
The Company designates certain derivative instruments as fair value hedges to mitigate the foreign exchange risk of changes in the fair value of a recognised asset or liability, or an unrecognised firm commitment. Changes in fair value of the designated portion of derivatives that
qualify as fair value hedges are recognised in profit and loss immediately, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk. When a hedged item is an unrecognised firm commitment to acquire an asset or assume a liability, the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged item, subsequent to its designation, is recognised as an asset or a liability with a corresponding gain or loss recognised in profit or loss. The initial carrying amount of the asset or liability that results from meeting the firm commitment is adjusted to include the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged item that was recognised in the balance sheet.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or when it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. The fair value adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item arising from the hedged risk is amortized to the profit and loss from that date.
Cash flow hedges
The Company designates certain derivative instruments as cash flow hedges to hedge the foreign exchange risk relating to the cash flows attributable to certain firm commitments / highly probable forecast transactions. At the inception of the hedge relationship, the Company documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, along with its risk management objectives and strategy. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Company assesses the effectiveness of the hedging instrument in offsetting changes in expected cash flows of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated under cash flow hedging reserve within equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the profit or loss. In case the Company opts to designate only the changes in the spot element of a foreign currency forward contract as a cash flow hedge, the changes in the forward element of the relevant forward contract, is recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated under cost of hedging reserve within equity, to the extent such forward element is aligned with the critical terms of the hedged item. The changes in the forward element of the relevant
forward contract which is not so aligned, is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity relating to effective and /or aligned portion (as described above) of the cash flow hedges are reclassified to profit or loss in the periods when the hedged item affects the profit or loss.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or when it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
(xv) Financial guarantee contracts
Financial guarantee contracts are recognised as a financial liability at the time the guarantee is issued. The liability is initially measured at fair value and subsequently at the higher of (i) the amount of expected credit loss; and (ii) the amount initially recognised less, where appropriate, cumulative amount of income recognised.
The fair value of financial guarantees is determined based on the present value of the difference in cash flows between the contractual payments required under the debt instrument and the payments that would be required without the guarantee or the estimated amount that would be payable to a third party for assuming the obligations.
Where guarantees in relation to loans of subsidiary company are provided for no compensation, the fair values are accounted for as contributions and recognised as part of the cost of the investment.
Note 3: Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of accounting estimates which, by definition, will seldom equal the actual results. Management also needs to exercise judgement in applying the Company's accounting policies.
This note provides an overview of the areas that involved a higher degree of judgement or complexity, and of items which
are more likely to be materially adjusted due to estimates and assumptions turning out to be different than those originally assessed.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated. They are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the Company and that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
(i) Critical accounting judgements
Following are the areas which involved complex and subjective judgements:
(a) Incentives under the U.P. Sugar Industry Promotion Policy, 2004
In a writ petition filed by the Company against the illegal withdrawal of U.P. Sugar Industry Promotion Policy, 2004 (“the Policy”) by the State Government of Uttar Pradesh, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court had decided the matter in favour of the Company and directed the State Government to quantify and pay all the incentives that were promised under the said Policy. The State Government however filed a Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court challenging the decision of the Hon'ble High Court against it.
While the case was sub-judice, the Company continued to avail and account for the remissions of statutory levies and duties aggregating to ' 41.58 crores, which it was entitled to under the Policy, in accordance with the interim directions of the High Court. Based on the aforesaid decision of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in its favour, the Company shall continue to pursue its claim of ' 113.75 crores filed towards one time capital subsidy and its claims towards other incentives by way of reimbursements against specified expenses aggregating to ' 130.16 crores, by filing necessary documents for the verification of the State Government authorities. The aforesaid amounts do not include any interest towards delayed settlement.
In view of uncertainties involved on account of the fact that the State Government has challenged the decision rendered against it and since the process of verification and quantification of claims by the State
Government for the incentive period of 10 years is yet to be taken up, the Company has not recognised the above benefits/incentives receivable under the Policy.
(ii) Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Following are the key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that may have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year:
(a) Fair value measurements and valuation processes
Some of the Company's assets and liabilities are measured at fair value for financial reporting purposes. When the fair values of these assets and liabilities cannot be measured based on quoted prices in active markets, their fair value is measured using valuation techniques by engaging third party qualified external valuers or internal valuation team to perform the valuation. The inputs to these models are taken from observable markets where possible, but where this is not feasible, a degree of judgement is required in establishing fair values. Judgements include considerations of inputs such as liquidity risk, credit risk and volatility. Changes in assumptions about these factors could affect the reported fair value of financial instruments. See note 5, 7, 10, 22 and 43 for further disclosures.
(b) Employee benefit plans
The cost of employee benefits under the defined benefit plan and other long term employee benefits as well as the present value of the obligation there against are determined using actuarial valuations. An actuarial valuation involves making various assumptions that may differ from actual developments in the future. These include the consideration of appropriate discount rate, future salary increases, attrition and mortality rates. Due to the complexities involved in the valuation and its long-term nature, obligation amount is highly sensitive to changes in these assumptions.
The parameter most subject to change is the discount rate. In determining the appropriate discount rate for plans, the management considers the market yields
on government bonds with a maturity term that is consistent with the term of the concerned defined benefit obligation. Future salary increases are based on expected future inflation rates and expected salary trends in the industry. Attrition rates are considered based on past observable data of employees leaving the services of the Company. The mortality rate is based on publicly available mortality tables. Those mortality tables tend to change only at intervals in response to demographic changes. See note 38 for further disclosures.
(c) Impairment of financial and non-financial assets
The Company has a stringent policy of ascertaining impairment, if any, of financial assets as a result of detailed scrutiny of major cases and through determining expected credit losses. Despite best estimates and periodic credit appraisals of customers, the Company's receivables are exposed to delinquency risks due to material adverse changes in business, financial or economic conditions that are expected to cause a significant change to the party's ability to meet its obligations. All such parameters relating to impairment or potential impairment are reviewed at each reporting date. See note 42(i) for further disclosures.
In case of non-financial assets, assessment of impairment indicators involves consideration of future risks. Further, the Company estimates asset's recoverable amount, which is higher of an asset's/ Cash Generating Units (CGU's) fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. In determining fair value less costs of disposal, recent market transactions are taken into account, if no such transactions can be identified, an appropriate valuation model is used.
(d) Revenue and cost estimation for long-duration construction & supply contracts
The revenue recognition pertaining to long-duration construction & supply contracts are determined on proportionate completion method based on actual
contract costs incurred till balance sheet date and total budgeted contract costs. An estimation of total budgeted contract cost involves making various assumptions that may differ from the actual developments in the future. These include delays in execution due to unforeseen reasons, inflation rate, future material rates, future labour rates etc. The estimates/assumptions are made considering past experience, market/inflation trends and technological developments etc. All such estimates/ assumptions are reviewed at each reporting date.
(e) Provision for warranty claims
The Company, in the usual course of sale, provides warranties on certain products and services, undertaking to repair or replace the items that fail to perform satisfactorily during the specified warranty period. Provisions made represent the amount of expected cost of meeting such obligations of rectifications / replacements based on best estimate considering the historical warranty claim information and any recent trends that may suggest future claims could differ from historical amounts. The assumptions made in relation to the current period are consistent with those in the prior years.
(f) Provision for litigations and contingencies
The provision for litigations and contingencies are determined based on evaluation made by the management of the present obligation arising from past events the settlement of which is expected to result in outflow of resources embodying economic
benefits, which involves judgements around estimating the ultimate outcome of such past events and measurement of the obligation amount.
(g) Useful life and residual value of plant, property equipment and intangible assets
The useful life and residual value of plant, property equipment and intangible assets are determined based on technical evaluation made by the management of the expected usage of the asset, the physical wear and tear and technical or commercial obsolescence of the asset. Due to the judgements involved in such estimations, the useful life and residual value are sensitive to the actual usage in future period.
(h) Current taxes and deferred taxes
Significant judgement is required in determination of taxability of certain incomes and deductibility of certain expenses during the estimation of the provision for income taxes.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and carry forward of unused tax losses and tax credits to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit would be available against which such deferred tax assets could be utilised. Significant management judgement is required to determine the amount of deferred tax assets that can be recognised, based upon the likely timing and the level of future taxable profits together with future tax optimisation strategies.
(a) Contract assets are initially recognised for revenue earned but not billed pending successful achievement of milestones. Upon achievement of milestones and billing, contract assets are reclassified to trade receivables.
Contract costs incurred to date plus recognised profits or less recognised losses are compared with progress billings raised on the customer - any surplus is considered as contract assets and shown as amounts due from customers under long-duration construction & supply contracts, whereas any shortfall is considered as contract liabilities and shown as the amounts due to customers under long-duration construction & supply contracts. Amounts billed for work performed which will become due upon fulfillment of specified conditions is considered as contract assets and shown as customer retentions. Amounts received before the related work is performed is considered as contract liabilities and is shown as advances from customers.
(b) Significant changes in contract assets and liabilities:
Decrease in contract assets (Due from customers under long-duration construction & supply contracts) has resulted due to billing in the current year of substantial work carried out in the previous year upon achieving contractual milestones, mainly in respect of sewage treatment projects in the municipal segment.
Decrease in contract assets (customer retentions) is mainly due to the release of retentions by the customers upon fulfillment of specified conditions in respect of sewage/wastewater treatment projects in the municipal/industrial segment.
Increase in contract liabilities (Amount due to customers under long-duration construction & supply contracts) is due to the reason that against the billing done during the current year, the revenue recognised in accordance with Ind AS 115 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers' is lower, mainly in respect of certain sewage treatment projects in the municipal segment.
Decrease in contract liabilities (Advances from Customers) is mainly attributable to adjustment of advances against billings under sewage treatment projects and supplies under power transmission business.
(c) Revenue recognised in relation to contract liabilities:
The following table shows how much of the revenue recognised in the current reporting period relates to carried-forward contract liabilities and how much relates to performance obligations that were satisfied in a prior year.
(iv) All inventories are expected to be utilised/sold within twelve months except certain critical and insurance items of stores and spares, which are utilised on need basis. Quantum of such stores and spares, which may be utilised beyond one year, is not determinable and is not expected to be material with reference to the total value of inventories.
(v) For impairment losses recognised during the year refer note 26 & 34.
(vi) In addition to the cost of inventories recognised as expense as mentioned in (i) above, there are write-downs of inventories to net realisable value amounting to ' 11.00 crores [31 March 2025: write-downs of ' 2.48 crores] which are also recognised as an expense during the year and included in ‘Changes in inventories of finished goods, stock-in-trade and work-in-progress' in statement of profit and loss.
(ii) Terms and rights attached to equity shares
The Company has only one class of equity shares with a par value of ' 1/- per share. The holder of equity shares is entitled to one vote per share. The Company declares and pays dividends in Indian rupees. The dividend proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to the approval of the shareholders in the ensuing Annual General Meeting.
In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of equity shares are entitled to receive the remaining assets of the Company, after meeting all liabilities and distribution of all preferential amounts, in proportion to their shareholding.
The above represents carrying value of land situated in Uttar Pradesh intended to be disposed of by the Company. The Company has entered into a memorandum of understanding to sell such land and has received an advance of ' 4.07 crores (31 March 2025: ' 0.93 crores) (refer note 19) in terms of such memorandun of understanding. The Company expects to transfer the title of such land in the near future. The asset does not form part of any segment assets. No impairment loss was recognised on reclassification of the land as held for sale (refer note 5) as the sale price of such land as per memorandum of understanding is higher than the carrying amount.
(i) Secured by pledge/hypothecation of the stock-in-trade, raw material, stores and spare parts, work-in-progress and trade receivables and second charge created/to be created on the properties of all the Engineering units, an immovable property at New Delhi and third charge on the properties of Sugar, Co-Generation and Distillery units of the Company on pari-passu basis except borrowings of ' 162.05 crores pertaining to Shamli Unit, which is secured by pledge/hypothecation of the stock-in-trade, raw material, stores and spare parts, work-in-progress and trade receivables and second charge created/ to be created on the all movable/immovable properties of the Shamli Unit. Interest rates on the above loans outstanding as at the year end range between 6.25% to 8.90% p.a. (weighted average interest rate: 6.66% p.a.)
(ii) Commercial papers issued at the interest rate of 6.5% p.a. for a tenor of 3 months, to be fully repaid on April 2026.
(iii) There are no differences in the quantities of stocks reported in the quarterly returns/statements filed with the banks vis-a¬ vis the books of accounts. In the books of accounts, the stocks are valued at lower of cost or net realizable value, whereas for the determination of drawing power, the sugar stocks are valued at rates which are lower than the book value as well as the valuation as per the RBI guidelines prescribed for commodities covered under selective credit control.
(i) Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of the Company by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in equity shares issued during the year, if any, and excluding treasury shares, if any.
(ii) Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and financing costs associated with dilutive potential equity shares and the weighted average number of additional equity shares that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive potential equity shares.
(iii) Earnings per share (Basic and Diluted) for both the periods presented above are calculated after considering the impact of amalgamation of SSEL and issuance of equity shares, pursuant to the composite scheme of arrangement as stated in note 45, post the date of acquisition of SSEL (i.e. 20 June 2024).
Note 38: Segment information
(i) Description of segments and principal activities
The operating segments are classified under two major businesses which the Company is engaged in, and are briefly described as under:
Sugar & Allied Businesses
(a) Sugar : The Company is a manufacturer of white crystal sugar, having eight manufacturing plants situated in the state of Uttar Pradesh. The sugar is sold to wholesalers and institutional users as well as in the export market. The Company uses its captively produced bagasse, generated as a by-product in the manufacturing of sugar, as a feed stock for generating power. Apart from meeting the captive power requirements of sugar plants and distilleries, the surplus power is exported to the state grid. Molasses, another by-product in the manufacturing of sugar, is used as raw material for producing alcohol/ethanol. The Company sells the surplus molasses and bagasse after meeting its levy obligation and captive requirements.
(b) Distillery : The Company operates six distilleries with an aggregate capacity of 960 kilo-litres per day, all located in the state of Uttar Pradesh, to produce ethanol and extra neutral alcohol, by using a variety of feedstocks. As forward integration of distillery operations, the Company also produces potable liquor, both Indian Made Indian Liquor (IMIL or Country Liquor) and Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) under its own brands.
Engineering Businesses
(a) Power transmission : This business segment is focused on manufacturing of high speed and niche low speed gears & gear boxes covering supply to OEMs, after market services and retrofitment of gearboxes, catering to the requirement of power sector, other industrial segments and defence. The manufacturing facility is located at Mysore, Karnataka.
(b) Water/Wastewater treatment : The business segment operates from Noida, Uttar Pradesh and provides engineered- to-order process equipment and comprehensive solutions in the water and wastewater management. This segment includes EPC contracts, Equipment supply and Operations & Maintenance contracts.
(viii)Information about major customers
There is no single customer who has contributed 10% or more to the Company's revenue in the years ended 31 March 2026 and 31 March 2025.
Note 39: Employee benefit plans
(i) Defined contribution plans
(a) The Company contributes to certain defined contribution retirement benefit plans under which the Company pays fixed contributions to separate entities (funds) or financial institutions or state managed benefit schemes. The Company has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. Following are the schemes covered under defined contributions plans of the Company:
Provident Fund Plan & Employee Pension Scheme: The Company makes monthly contributions at prescribed rates towards Employee Provident Fund/ Employee Pension Scheme administered and managed by the Government of India.
Employee State Insurance: The Company makes prescribed monthly contributions towards Employees State Insurance Scheme.
Superannuation Scheme: The Company contributes towards a fund established to provide superannuation benefit to certain employees in terms of Group Superannuation Policies entered into by such fund with the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
National Pension Scheme: The Company makes contributions to the National Pension Scheme fund in respect of certain employees of the Company.
(b) The expense recognised during the period towards defined contribution plans are as follows:
(ii) Defined benefit plan (Gratuity)
(a) The Company operates a defined benefit retirement plan under which the Company pays certain defined benefit by way of gratuity to its employees. The Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement/ termination of employment or upon death of an employee, based on the respective employees' salary and years of employment with the Company.
(b) Risk exposure
The plan typically exposes the Company to number of actuarial risks, the most significant of which are detailed below:
Investment risk: The plan liabilities are calculated using a discount rate set with references to government bond yields as at end of reporting period; if plan assets underperform compared to the government bonds discount rate, this will create or increase a deficit.
Interest risk: A decrease in government bond yields will increase plan liabilities, although this is expected to be partially offset by an increase in the value of the plan's debt instruments.
Life expectancy: The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is calculated by reference to the best estimate of the mortality of plan participants during their employment. A change in the life expectancy of the plan participants will impact the plan's liability.
Salary risk: The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is calculated by reference to the future salaries of plan participants. As such, an increase in the salary of the plan participants will increase the plan's liability.
Attrition rate: The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is impacted by the rate of employee turnover, disability and early retirement of plan participants. A change in the attrition rate of the plan participants will impact the plan's liability.
c) The significant actuarial assumptions used for the purposes of the actuarial valuations were as follows:
(iii) Defined benefit plan (Provident fund)
(a) Apart from the contributions made by the Company to defined contribution provident fund plan referred in (i) above, the Company has also set up a provident fund trust, to secure the provident fund dues in respect of certain employees, which is administered by the concerned trustees. The rules of the such provident fund require that if the Board of Trustees are unable to pay interest at the rate declared by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, Government of India, under para 60 of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 for the reason that the return on investment is less or for any other reason, then the deficiency shall be made good by the Company when determined.
(b) For the year ended 31 March 2026, the Company contributed ' 0.01 crores (31 March 2025: ' 0.01 crores) to the defined benefit provident fund plan.
The remuneration of key management personnel is determined by the remuneration committee having regard to the performance of individuals, market trends and applicable provisions of Companies Act, 2013.
(iv) Remuneration and outstanding balances of key management personnel does not include long term employee benefits by way of gratuity and compensated absences, which are payable only upon cessation of employment and provided on the basis of actuarial valuation by the Company.
(v) The Company has provided corporate guarantees amounting to ' 100 crores (31 March 2025: ' 158 crores) in connection with loans agreed to be granted by the lender to wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Outstanding balance of loans under such lending arrangements as at 31 March 2026 is ' 64.19 crores (31 March 2025: ' 77.53 crores).
(vi) Terms & conditions:
(a) Transactions relating to dividends were on same terms and conditions that applied to other shareholders.
(b) Loans to subsidiaries were given at normal commercial terms & conditions at prevailing market rate of interest.
(c) Other transactions are made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's length transactions.
(d) The outstanding balances at the year-end are unsecured and settlement to take place in cash.
Note 41: Capital management
For the purpose of capital management, capital includes net debt and total equity of the Company. The primary objective of the capital management is to maximize shareholders' value along with an objective to keep the leverage in check in view of cyclical and capital intensive sugar business of the Company.
The sugar business is the major business of the Company which is seasonal in nature. The entire production of sugar takes place in about six months and is sold throughout the year. It thus necessitates maintaining high levels of sugar inventory requiring high working capital funding. Sugar business being a cyclical business, it is prudent to avoid high leverage and the resultant high finance cost. It is the endeavour of the Company to prune down debts to acceptable levels based on its financial position.
The Company may resort to further issue of capital for projects which can not be fully funded through internal accruals/debt and/ or to finance working capital requirements.
The Company monitors capital structure through gearing ratio represented by debt-equity ratio (debt/total equity). In addition to the gearing ratio, the Company also looks at long-term loans and lease liabilities to operating profit ratio (long-term loans and lease liabilities/EBITDA) which provides an indication of adequacy of earnings to service the debts. The Company diligently negotiates the terms and conditions of the loans and ensures adherence to all the financial covenants. The Company generally incorporates a clause in loan agreements for prepayment of loans without any premium. The gearing ratio and long-term loans and lease liabilities/EBITDA ratio for the Company as at the end of reporting period were as follows:
No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes for managing capital during the years ended 31 March 2026 and 31 March 2025.
The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.
Note 42: Financial risk management
The Company's principal financial liabilities comprise borrowings, lease liabilities, trade payables and other payables. The main purpose of the financial liabilities is to finance the Company's operations. The Company's principal financial assets include loans, trade and other receivables and cash and bank balances. The Company also holds certain investments, measured at fair value through profit or loss / amortised cost and enters into derivative transactions, which are not extensive.
The Company's activities expose it mainly to market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. The monitoring and management of such risks is undertaken by the senior management of the Company and there are appropriate policies and procedures in place through which such financial risks are identified, measured and managed. The Company has a specialised team to undertake derivative activities for risk management purposes and such team has appropriate skills, experience and expertise. It is the Company policy not to carry out any trading in derivative for speculative purposes. The Audit Committee and the Board are regularly apprised of the exposures and risks every quarter and mitigation measures are extensively discussed.
(i) Credit risk
Credit risk is associated with the possibility of a counterparty defaulting on its contractual obligations to pay, resulting in financial loss to the Company. The Company is exposed to credit risks from its operating activities, primarily trade receivables and retentions. The credit risks in respect of deposits with the banks, foreign exchange transactions and other financial instruments are nominal. As required, the Company also advances loans to its subsidiary companies and there is some credit risk associated with it.
(a) Credit risk management
The customer credit risk is managed by each business subject to the Company's established policy, procedure and controls relating to customer credit risk management. Various businesses require different processes and policies to be followed based on the business risks, industry practice and customer profiles.
In the case of Sugar business, majority of the sales are made either against advance payments or at a very short credit period upto 15-30 days to reputed institutional buyers through established sugar agents whereas in Cogeneration
business, forming part of Sugar business, and Distillery, most of the sales are made to Government customers, such as, State Electricity Board (UPPCL) and Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs). There may be delays in receiving payments from UPPCL but the risk in respect of realisation of dues is minimal. In Power transmission business, it is the policy of the Company to receive payment prior to delivery of the material except in the case of some well established OEMs, including group companies and public sector undertakings, where credit up to 90 days is extended. Water business is engaged in Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) business in the municipal and industrial sectors where it is customary to have prescribed retentions which are payable upon completion of the project and after satisfactory performance of the plant.
In order to contain the business risk especially with respect to long-duration construction & supply contracts, creditworthiness of the customer is ensured through scrutiny of its financials, status of financial closure of the project, if required, market reports and reference checks. The Company remains vigilant and regularly assesses the financial position of customers during execution of contracts with a view to restrict risks of delays and default. In view of its diversified business profile and considering the size of the Company, credit risks from receivables are well contained on an overall basis.
The impairment analysis is performed on each reporting period on individual basis for major customers. In addition, a large number of receivables are grouped and assessed for impairment collectively. The calculation of impairment loss is based on historical data of losses, current conditions and forecasts and future economic conditions. The Company's maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying amount of each financial asset as detailed in note 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13.
Authorities / entities where there is no track record of short receipts. ECL arising from delays in receiving payments from the Government customers pursuant to sale of goods or under construction contracts are not considered if such delays are commonly prevalent in the industry and / or the delays are not exceeding one year. All short receipts, other than arising from expense claims offset by the counter-party, are duly considered in determining ECL. In view of the business model of the Company's engineered-to-order products and the profile of trade receivables, the determination of provision based on age analysis may not be realistic and hence, the provision of expected credit loss is determined for the total trade receivables outstanding as on the reporting date. This provision for ECL is made in addition to the specific credit losses, if any, provided on specific financial assets.
In the case of Water and Power transmission businesses, the percentage receivables to external sales is high whereas the overall ratio for the Company is much lower. In the case of EPC projects undertaken by Water business, the receivables are high as per the norms of the industry and terms of the contracts. A majority of such projects are executed for the municipalities and before bidding for any contract, the Water business carries out due-diligence to ensure that the customer has made satisfactory funding arrangements. In the case of Power transmission business, negotiated credit is allowed to reputed OEMs. The percentage receivables to external sales is also high due to higher year end sales.
Overall, the credit risk from receivable is low in view of diverse businesses and government customers.
(ii) Liquidity risk
The Company uses liquidity forecast tools to manage its liquidity. The Company operates capital intensive sugar business and has obligation to timely make cane price payments within the statutory time period. The Company is able to organise liquidity through internal accruals and through working capital loans. The Company has good relationship with its lenders,
(b) Provision for expected credit losses
Basis as explained above, life time expected credit loss (“ECL”) is determined on trade receivables except in cases where advance payment terms are prescribed or payment is due from Central / State Government or Government
has not defaulted at any point of time in the past and is maintaining healthy credit ratings (viz. short term A1 and long term AA under watch with developing implications from ICRA), as a result of which it does not experience any difficulty in arranging funds from its lenders. However, when the sugar fundamentals are unfavourable, either due to market forces or due to excessive cane pricing by the Government, the payment of cane price gets delayed though it is the endeavour of the Company to make cane payment on a priority basis. It is the objective and focus of the Company to reduce debts to be able to meet the cyclicalities of the sugar business.
Apart from cyclical sugar business, the Company has alternate revenue streams in the form of distillery and engineering business, which, to a large extent, offset the impact of sugar cyclicalities.
In view of seasonal nature of sugar business, which is a dominant business of the Company, there is a peak build-up of sugar inventories at the year end, resulting in peak working capital requirement. With the liquidation of such inventories over the year, the working capital requirement is gradually reduced. Thus, the current ratio computed at the year end is not a reflection of average and realistic ratio for the year.
(a) Maturities of financial instruments
Maturities of non-derivative financial liabilities:
The following table details the remaining contractual maturity for its non-derivative financial liabilities with agreed repayment periods. The amounts disclosed in the table have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities. The contractual maturity is based on the earliest date on which the Company may be required to pay.
Maturities of derivative financial instruments:
The Company enters into derivative contracts (foreign exchange forward contracts) that are generally settled on a net basis to manage some of its foreign currency exposures. Derivative liabilities (net) of ' 2.75 crores as at 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025: Derivative liabilities (net) ' 0.05 crores), shall mature within one year from reporting date.
(iii) Market risk
The Company is exposed to following key market risks:
(a) Interest rate risk on loans and borrowings
(b) Sugar price risk
(c) Other market risks
(a) Interest rate risk
Most of the borrowings availed by the Company are subject to interest on floating rate basis linked to the Repo rate / MCLR (Marginal Cost of funds based Lending Rate). In view of the fact that the total borrowings of the Company are quite substantial, the Company is exposed to interest rate risk.
The strategy of the Company to opt for floating interest rates is helpful in maintaining market related realistic rates. Further, most of the loans and borrowings have a prepayment clause through which the loans could be prepaid without any prepayment premium. The said clause helps the Company to arrange debt substitution to bring down the interest costs or to prepay the loans out of the surplus funds held. The interest rate risk is mitigated upto certain extent as 28% of the long term debts as at 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025: 49% of long term debts) comprises loans carrying concessional interest rates/interest subvention.
While declining interest rates would be beneficial to the Company, adverse interest rate fluctuations could increase the finance cost. The total impact, in respect of borrowings on floating interest rate basis, is limited as per sensitivity analysis provided here under:
(b) Sugar price risk
The sugar prices are dependent inter-alia on domestic and global sugar balance - higher supplies lead to softening of sugar prices whereas higher demand than available supplies lead to hardening of sugar prices. The Company sells most of its sugar in the domestic market where there are no effective mechanism available to hedge sugar prices in view of limited breadth in the commodity exchanges. The Company also exports sugar in the years of surplus production based on Government policy on exports.
Adverse changes in sugar price impact the Company in the following manner:
- The Company values sugar stocks at lower of cost of production (COP) and net realisable value (NRV). In the event, the COP of sugar is higher than the NRV, the stocks are written down to NRV leading to recognition of loss on such inventory.
The cost of production of sugar is generally lower than the net realisable value of sugar and hence, chances of significant losses due to inventory write down are low. Further, the Central Government has prescribed Minimum Selling Price (MSP) for sugar, which is subject to revision from time to time. It ensures that there is no steep decline in the sugar prices.
(c) Other market risks
The other market risks includes Equity price risk and Foreign currency risk.
Equity price risk arise in respect of listed and unlisted equity securities which may be susceptible to market price fluctuations. In view of nominal value of investments being held by the Company, other than strategic investments, the magnitude of risk is not significant.
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk on certain contracts in connection with export and import of goods and services. The Company mitigates such risk by entering into off-setting derivative contracts with Banks, mainly foreign exchange forward contracts, of appropriate maturity and amounts at adequate intervals.
In respect of firm commitments under certain contracts involving receipt/payment of consideration in foreign currency, the Company has chosen to follow hedge accounting to hedge the risks attributable to the cash flows/fair value in respect of such firm commitments. The foreign exchange risk arises in respect of the movement in the foreign currency from the time the contract is negotiated/entered into and till the time the consideration under the contract is actually settled. In accordance with its risk management policy, the Company manages such risks, generally by entering into foreign exchange forward contracts for the appropriate maturity with banks. The risk mitigation strategy involves determination of the timing and the amount of hedge to be taken in a progressive manner, with a view to protect the exchange rate considered at the time of acceptance of the contract. The Company, generally hedges the foreign currency risk directly to INR and for hedge accounting, designates a hedge ratio of generally 1:1 in respect of all such cash flow hedges/fair value hedges. Besides monitoring the movements in the foreign exchange market, the Company also takes the advice of outside consultants in arriving at its hedging decision. Refer note 2 (xiv) for further details on accounting policy in respect of hedge accounting.
(ii) Fair value hierarchy
This section explains the judgements and estimates made in determining the fair values of the financial instruments that are recognised and measured at fair value. To provide an indication about the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Company has classified its financial instruments into the three levels prescribed under the accounting standard. An explanation of each level follows underneath the table.
Level 1: Level 1 hierarchy includes financial instruments measured using quoted unadjusted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. This includes listed equity instruments that have quoted price. The fair value of all equity instruments which are traded in the stock exchanges is valued using the closing price as at the reporting date.
Level 2: The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques which maximise the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.
Level 3: If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3. There are no transfers between levels 1 and 2 during the year.
(iii) Valuation technique used to determine fair value
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include the fair value of derivatives (viz. foreign exchange forward contracts) is determined using market observable inputs, including prevalent forward rates for the maturities of the respective contracts and interest rate curves as indicated by banks and third parties.
All of the resulting fair value estimates are included in level 2.
(iv) Valuation processes
The Corporate finance team has requisite knowledge and skills in valuation of financial instruments. The team headed by Group CFO directly reports to the audit committee on the fair value of financial instruments.
(v) The management considers that the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities recognised in the financial statements approximate their fair values.
Note 45: Composite Scheme of Arrangement
The Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench (‘Hon'ble NCLT') vide its orders dated 7 May 2026 and 18 May 2026 has approved the Composite Scheme of Arrangement amongst Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited (‘TEl L/ the Company'), Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Limited (‘SSEL') and Triveni Power Transmission Limited (‘TPTL') and their respective shareholders and creditors, under Section 230 to 232 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the rules made thereunder (‘the Scheme'). Certified copy of the said order of Hon'ble NCLT was filed with the Registrar of Companies on 19 May 2026 (‘Effective date'). In accordance with the Scheme, SSEL has been amalgamated with TElL w.e.f. the amalgamation appointed date of 1 April 2025 and demerger of Power Transmission Business undertaking (‘PTB undertaking') of TElL and its vesting in TPTL as a going concern, shall be given effect to w.e.f. the demerger appointed date of 1 April 2026, as approved by Hon'ble NCLT.
(i) Amalgamation of SSEL
SSEL, a company primarily engaged in the business of sugar manufacturing and distillation of alcohol, became a subsidiary of the Company w.e.f. 20 June 2024 consequent to the acquisition of its 61.77% equity shares by the Company. Upon the Scheme becoming effective, the whole of the undertaking of SSEL stood transferred to and vested into the Company, as a going concern w.e.f. the amalgamation appointed date of 1 April 2025. As a consideration for the amalgamation, 1465048 equity shares of face value of ' 1 each are to be issued to the shareholders (other than the Company) of SSEL by the Company, in the ratio of 100 equity shares of face value of ' 1 each of the Company for every 137 equity shares of face value of ' 10 each of SSEL, held by them on the Record Date to be fixed. The shares held by the Company in SSEL shall stand cancelled.
The Company has accounted for the amalgamation in accordance with Pooling of Interest method as laid down in Appendix C of Ind AS 103 ‘Business Combinations' and as specified in the Scheme. All assets, liabilities and reserves of SSEL are recorded at their carrying values as at amalgamation appointed date of 1 April 2025, as appearing in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The difference between the carrying values of net assets (including reserves) of SSEL recorded by the Company and the aggregate of the value of investments in the equity shares of SSEL cancelled and the face value of equity shares to be issued by the Company, has been recognised as capital reserve.
(ii) Demerger of PTB undertaking
Upon the Scheme becoming effective, the PTB undertaking, primarily engaged in the business of manufacturing of high speed and niche low speed gears & gear boxes, together with all its rights, benefits, interests and obligations therein, shall stand transferred to and vested into TPTL, as a going concern, and become the property of, and an integral part of TPTL from the demerger appointed date of 1 April 2026. As a consideration for the demerger, 73454339 equity shares of face value of ' 2 each are to be issued to the shareholders of the Company by TPTL, in the ratio of 1 equity share of face value of ' 2 each of TPTL for every 3 equity shares of face value of ' 1 each of the Company. The existing equity shares in TPTL shall continue to be held by the Company.
As the Hon'ble NCLT's approval was received after 31 March 2026, the demerger is treated as a non-adjusting event for the financial year ended 31 March 2026. Consequently, the assets, liabilities and the specific reserves pertaining to PTB undertaking continue to be recognised in the financial statements of the Company as of 31 March 2026 and accounting impact of demerger will be reflected in the next financial year. As at the demerger appointed date of 1 April 2026, the carrying values of net assets (including specific reserves) pertaining to PTB undertaking of ' 445.28 crores shall be derecognised and transferred to TPTL. The net carrying values so derecognised proportionate to the continued holding of the Company in TPTL, of ' 133.05 crores shall be added to the carrying value of investment held by the Company in TPTL. The difference, between the carrying values of net assets (including specific reserves) derecognised and the said addition to the investments held by the Company in TPTL, of ' 312.23 crores shall be adjusted against other equity.
Note 46: Leases As Lessee
Assets taken under lease mainly include various residential, office, godown premises and plots of land. These are generally not non-cancellable leases (except for few premises) having unexpired period upto sixty four years. Except a few, the leases are generally renewable by mutual consent and on mutually agreeable terms. The Company has given refundable interest free security deposits under certain lease agreements. There is no contingent rent, sublease payments or restriction imposed in the lease agreement.
As Lessor
The Company has given certain portion of its office / factory premises under operating leases [including lease of investment property (refer note 5)]. These leases are not non-cancellable and are extendable by mutual consent and at mutually agreeable terms. The gross carrying amount, accumulated depreciation and depreciation recognised in the statement of profit and loss in respect of such portion of the leased premises are not separately identifiable. There is no impairment loss in respect of such premises. No contingent rent has been recognised in the statement of profit and loss. There are no minimum future lease payments as there are no non-cancellable leases. Lease income is recognised in the statement of profit and loss under “Other income” (refer note 26). Lease income earned by the Company from its investment properties and direct operating expenses arising on the investment properties for the year is set out in note 5.
Note 52: Recent accounting pronouncements not yet effective
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, vide notification dated 13 August 2025, has made amendments to Ind AS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements' regarding classification of long-term loans as current, in the event of breach of covenant on or before the end of the reporting period with the effect that the loan becomes payable on demand even if the lender agreed, after the reporting period and before the approval of financial statements, not to demand payment as a consequence of the breach. Amendments clarify that classification depends on rights existing at the reporting date, removing the Indian ‘carve-out' allowing post-balance sheet covenant waivers to keep liabilities non-current. This amendment is effective from 1 April 2026 and the Company intends to adopt these amendments when they become effective. The Company does not expect these amendments to have any significant impact on its financial statements.
Note 53: Comparatives
The Company has reclassified certain items of financials of comparative year to conform to this year's classification, however, impact of these reclassification are not material. Figures of the comparative year have been restated to give the accounting effect of amalgamation of SSEL with the Company, as per the composite scheme of arrangement (refer note 45).
Note 54: Approval of standalone financial statements
The standalone financial statements were approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 29 May 2026 subject to approval of shareholders.
|