We have audited the accompanying Standalone Financial Statements of MBL Infrastructure Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the standalone balance sheet as at March 31,2025, and the standalone statement of profit and loss including other comprehensive income, the standalone statement of changes in equity and the standalone statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the standalone financial statements, including a summary of the material accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as "the Standalone Financial Statements").
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations provided to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 as amended ("the Act") in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Act, read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended, thereof ("Ind AS") and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31,2025, and its profit (including other comprehensive income), changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Basis of Opinion
We conducted our audit of the standalone financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing ("SAs") as specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those SAs are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the ICAI's Code of Ethics.
We believe that the audit evidence obtained by us is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.
Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to the following matters in the notes to the accompanying Standalone Financial Statements:
a. Note 3(a) regarding the approval of Resolution Plan dated November 22, 2017, submitted by Mr. A K Lakhotia with 78.50% CoC majority support was approved under IBC, 2016 and Orders dated April 18, 2018, March 11,2022, September 13, 2023 and September 30, 2024 by Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT"), Kolkata, Orders dated August 16, 2019, May 23, 2023 and August 10, 2023 by Hon'ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT") and Orders dated January 18, 2022, August 04, 2023 and September 25, 2023 by Hon'ble Supreme Court were passed regarding approval and implementation of the Resolution Plan and the Resolution Plan has attained finality. The documents for implementation of the Approved Resolution Plan by the Banks have been executed and the date of implementation of the Package/Resolution Plan has been declared by the Banks as September 04,2024.
b. Note 6.3 regarding Non-Current Investment by the Company as at March 31, 2025 amounting to Rs.1500.00 lakhs (March 31, 2024; Rs.1500.00 lakhs) in its wholly owned subsidiary company MBL (MP) Toll Road Company Ltd ("MTRCL"). The net worth of subsidiary as at March 31,2025 have been fully eroded. The net worth of subsidiary does not represent true market value of the underlying investment/ assets. There was a participation in concession agreement dated December 07, 2011 by way of project centric ECB facility as per prudential norms of financing infrastructure projects in India in terms of RBI guidelines & other applicable Indian laws in Toll Annuity project of MTRCL. Repayments and interest were to be made from escrow account out of deposit of semiannual annuity and user fee (toll) on achievement of Completion / Commercial Operation Date (COD). Arbitration proceedings have been initiated by MTRCL under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 vide notice dated March 20, 2023 against the Authority and Lenders Representative / Escrow Agent for differences and disputes that have arisen due to breach of escrow agreement dated March 22, 2012. The Arbitration case has been registered with Indian Council of Arbitration as case No. AC-2373 and MTRCL has raised claims. MTRCL has also filed application under Section 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 before Commercial Court, Bhopal and the case has been registered as MJC AV 42/2024. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, New Delhi) vide its order dated January 21,2025 has initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings
on an application filed by Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd (PNBIL) u/s 7 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Resolution Professional (RP) has been appointed. The powers of the members of the Board of Directors of MTRCL are suspended and management of MTRCL vests with RP. Appeal has been filed before Hon'ble NCLAT against the Adjudicating Authority order dated January 21, 2025, which is pending adjudication. The Company has filed its claims with RP which has been admitted. Without prejudice the Company and MTRCL being MSME are qualified to submit a Resolution Plan in terms of IBC, 2016 and is declared as one of the prospective Resolution Applicant by RP Based on estimates like future business plan, arbitration proceedings and other factors, the management is confident that the realisable amount is higher than the carrying value of the investment and, therefore, the investment in the above subsidiary is good and recoverable.
c. Note 6.4 regarding Non-Current Investment by the Company as at March 31, 2025 amounting to Rs.3,984.25 lakhs (March 31, 2024; Rs.2,984.25 lakhs) in its wholly owned subsidiary company MBL Projects Ltd. The net worth of the subsidiary does not represent true market value of the underlying investment/assets. The subsidiary holds shares in downstream SPVs in which projects were cancelled/ terminated. Claims have been filed against cancellation/termination of the projects. These claims are based on the terms and conditions implicit in the contract in respect of cancelled/terminated projects. Considering the contractual tenability; legal advice received and progress of arbitration/ litigation, the management is confident of recovery of these claims. In view of this, the management is confident that the realisable amount is higher than the carrying value of the investment and, therefore, has considered the investment in the above subsidiary as good and recoverable.
d. Note 6.5 regarding Non-Current Investment by the Company as at March 31, 2025 amounting to Rs.18505.23 lakhs (March 31, 2024; Rs.18505.23 lakhs) in its wholly owned subsidiary company Suratgarh Bikaner Toll Road Company Private Limited (SBTRCPL). The net worth of the subsidiary does not represent true market value of the underlying investment/assets. There has been delay in Completion / Commercial Operation Date (COD) in respect of the DBFOT Project. The Competent Authority under the Concession Agreement has approved/granted extension of time for Completion/full COD of the Project till June 08, 2023. The repayment of loans is linked to Completion / COD. The Lenders had given undertaking not to recover till Completion. Differences and disputes have arisen between the consortium of banks and SBTRCPL about the excess recovery on the basis of completion / undertaking and as per Escrow Agreement dated April 10, 2013 and the company has invoked arbitration in terms of the dispute resolution mechanism under the Escrow Agreement dated April 10, 2013. The original sanction rate of interest was 12.50% p.a. with reset clause on completion / COD. Pending dispute resolution, provision for interest has been made for finance cost @ 9.60% p.a. w.e.f. February 17, 2019 (applicable base rate as per First Supplemental Agreement of Common Term Loan Documentation with Lenders). The completion of the original scope of work was completed on June 08, 2023. In case the dispute is decided against the company, there may be additional provision of interest of Rs.6,417.45 lakhs as on March 31,2025 (Rs.6,150.01 lakhs as on March 31,2024). In case the dispute is resolved / settlement is arrived at with the banks, the provision of interest may be reversed, the amount of which is not ascertained as on date. Further, the classification of term loan to long term/current maturity, provision for claims, carriage ways of intangible assets etc. may undergo change. Two of the consortium lenders of SBTRCPL have filed application under section 7 of the IBC, 2016 which has been contested by SBTRCPL. All five of the consortium lenders of SBTRCPL have filed petitions under Section 19(4) of the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 against SBTRCPL, which has been contested by SBTRCPL. As per the legal advice received by the Company the applications filed are in the contravention and derogation of the Escrow Agreement, Substitution Agreement and Common Loan Agreement and are not maintainable. Based on estimates like future business plan, arbitration proceedings and other factors, the management is confident that the realisable amount is higher than the carrying value of the investment and, therefore, the investment in the above subsidiary is good and recoverable.
e. Note 6.6 regarding Non-Current Investment by the Company as at March 31, 2025 amounting to Rs.5110.00 lakhs (March 31, 2024; Rs.5110.00 lakhs) in its wholly owned subsidiary company MBL Highway Development Company Limited (MHDCL). The net worth of subsidiary does not represent true market value of the underlying investment/assets. There was a participation in concession agreement dated September 09, 2011 by way of project centric ECB facility as per prudential norms of financing infrastructure projects in India as per RBI guidelines and other applicable Indian laws in DBFOT project of MHDCL. Repayments and interest were to be made from escrow account out of deposit of user fee (toll) on achievement of Commercial Operation Date (COD). However, the concession agreement was terminated by Authority on November 18, 2016. Legal proceedings are pending at various forums for adjudication of disputes including dispute resolution proceedings in India and summary judgement and certificate of enforcement from a foreign country and its execution petition in India by such participant. MHDCL has received legal advice that the same is not enforceable. MHDCL has counter claims against the participant exceeding the amount of the claims. However, provision has been made for claims including foreign exchange fluctuation as per 'conservative principles of accounting' but the same is not acknowledged as debt payable by MHDCL. MHDCL has invoked arbitration against the Authority and Lenders Representative / Escrow Agent on account of material defaults/breach on their part in fulfilling their obligations as per provisions of Substitution Agreement & Escrow Agreement and filed claims before Arbitral Tribunal constituted by Indian Council of Arbitration under the Substitution Agreement. Based on estimates like future business plan,
arbitration proceedings and other factors, the management is confident that the realisable amount is higher than the carrying value of the investment and, therefore, the investment in the above subsidiary is good and recoverable.
f. Note 19.2 regarding the issue of share capital. During the period under review, the Company pursuant to approved Resolution Plan under IBC, 2016 had issued and allotted 1,50,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each to entity forming part of Promoter Group. The Company had made Preferential Allotment of 27,74,632 equity shares at Rs.61.10 per share (including share premium of Rs.51.10 per share) to unsecured creditors. The equity share capital of the Company stands enhanced from Rs.10,475.46 lakhs as at March 31,2024 to Rs.12,252.92 lakhs as at March 31,2025.
g. Note 28.3 regarding the legal advice received by the Company, the dissenting financial creditors are to be paid liquidation value in priority in proportion in 39 unequated quarterly installments over the period of 10 years in terms of the approved Resolution Plan. Hon'ble NCLT, Kolkata Bench vide its order dated December 20, 2024 has held that dissenting financial creditors are to get payment in full before any payment is made to the assenting financial creditors, which has been upheld by Hon'ble NCLAT by order dated March 18, 2025. The Company has preferred a Civil Appeal before Hon'ble Supreme Court, which is pending adjudication.
h. Note 38 regarding the exceptional items for Rs.4,025.59 lakhs resulted from implementation of the Package/ Resolution Plan by the Banks/ Financial Creditors and are capital in nature and no income/profit has accrued nor any cash flow realised to the Company. The amount has been routed through Profit & Loss account as per requirement of Ind AS and being capital in nature has been transferred to Capital Reserve. Moreover, no real income/ profit has accrued to the Company and in view of the above the same is not taxable under provisions of Income Tax Act and Rules.
i. Note 43.2 regarding the Resolution Plan approved under IBC is binding on all creditors including the Central Government, State Government, any Local Authority under section 31(1) of IBC, 2016. Claims not filed/ not admitted/ claims which do not form part of the approved Resolution Plan stand extinguished. The payments of claims are subject to reconciliation and rights and remedies available to the Company and are not acknowledged as debt.
j. Note 43.3 regarding the legal advice received, in case of claim not filed by creditor against Corporate Guarantee(s) provided by the Company in respect of subsidiary company(ies), the same stand extinguished. Without prejudice to the above, as per the Resolution Plan dated November 22, 2017 of the Company approved under IBC, 2016 read with Orders dated April 18, 2018, March 11, 2022 and September 13, 2023 by Hon'ble NCLT, Kolkata, Order dated August 16, 2019 and May 23, 2023 passed by Hon'ble NCLAT and Order dated January 18, 2022, August 04, 2023 and September 25, 2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court, the treatment of Corporate Guarantees is "Any amount arising out of invocation of existing Corporate Guarantees/Contingent Liabilities other than the current sub-judice matters will be paid after the payment of all the dues of Financial Creditors as per resolution plan, without any interest and penalties subject to the rights and remedies available to the Company" and "All amounts will be paid after proper reconciliation and without prejudice to the legal remedies available to the Company" However, Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd has filed application u/s 7 of IBC, 2016 for the Corporate Guarantee for the 'project centric' finance in respect of MBL (MP) Toll Road Company Ltd. As per the legal advice received, such application has been filed in the contravention and derogation of the approved Resolution Plan under IBC, 2016 and is not maintainable.
k. Note 47.1 regarding recognition of deferred tax assets. Persuant to the provisions of Ind AS 12 "Income Taxes" the Company has conservatively recognized deferred tax assets (net) as at March 31, 2025 amounting to Rs.15,144.78 lakhs (March 31, 2024 Rs.15,144.78 lakhs) corresponding to unused brought forward income tax losses for which it has convincing evidences viz. opportunities available in area of its core competence, bidding/pre-qualification limit, conducive government policies and market conditions, recovery of pending claims, TEV study and approved Resolution Plan etc., based on which it is inferred that sufficient taxable profit will be available against which unused tax losses can be utilised by the Company.
l. Note 53 regarding the claims in respect of cost over-runs arising due to client responsibility delays, client's suspension of projects, deviation in design, change in scope of work etc., which are at various stages of negotiation/ discussion with the clients/ arbitration /litigation. The realisability of these claims are estimated by the Company based on contractual terms, historical experience with similar claims as well as legal opinion obtained from internal and external experts, wherever necessary. Revenue in respect of claim is recognised to the extent the Company is reasonably certain of their realisation. Realisation of above claims may be lower than the claims recognized if the Company decides to settle the same out of court in future considering the substantial time involved in litigation. Impact thereof will be considered in the year of such settlement.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of the above matters.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of the most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements for the year ended March 31,2025 These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the standalone financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
Description of Key Audit Matters
|
Measurement of Construction Revenue - Refer Note 3(n)
|
|
The Key Audit Matters
|
How the matter was addressed in audit
|
|
Revenue from construction contracts represents significant portion of the total revenue from the operations of the Company. Revenue from these contracts is recognized on satisfaction of performance obligation over time in accordance with the requirements of relevant Indian accounting standards.
The Company has contracts whose revenue recognition can be dependent on a high level of judgement over the percentage of completion. It is based on their best estimate of the costs to complete, claims and ability to deliver the contract within the contractual time limit.
The Company's current year revenue from construction contracts and amount of expenses incurred, arise from transaction with related parties as well. These related parties are principally subsidiaries of the Company.
The Company uses an input method based on costs incurred to measure progress of the projects. Under this approach, the Company recognises revenue based on the costs incurred to date relative to the estimated total costs to complete the performance obligation. Profit is not recognised until the outcome of the contract is fairly certain.
Revenues, total estimated contract costs and profit recognition may deviate significantly from original estimates based on new knowledge about cost overruns and changes in project scope over the term of a construction contract.
|
Our audit procedures included:
• Obtaining an understanding and consideration of the appropriateness of the policies in respect of revenue recognition against the criteria in the Indian accounting standards.
• Evaluated the design and implementation and tested operating effectiveness of key controls (including IT controls) around the contract price, estimation of costs to complete management's testing of these attributes.
• Understanding and documenting the contract and other related contractual provisions including contractually agreed deliverables, termination rights, penalties for delay, etc to understand the nature and scope of the arrangements with the customer.
• Assessing key judgements inherent in the estimation of significant construction contract projects. It includes comparing the stage-of- completion and costs of completion on significant projects.
• We assessed the estimated costs to complete, variations in contract price and contract costs and underlying invoices, signed contracts/statements of work completed for all ongoing projects.
• We understood and documented the Company's process for identifying related parties and recording related party transactions. We have also assessed the Company's key controls in relation to the assessment and approval of related party transactions and examined the Company's disclosures in respect of the transactions.
• We tested on test check basis, the approvals of the Audit Committee and Board of Directors for related party transactions.
• We tested samples of manual journals posted to revenue to identify unusual items.
• We checked adequacy of the disclosures made in Note 46 to the Company's standalone financial statements are compliant with Ind AS -115..
|
|
Assessment of recoverability of investments in subsidiaries - Refer Note 4 (c)
|
|
The Key Audit Matters
|
How the matter was addressed in audit
|
|
The Company has significant investments in subsidiaries which carry out road and other infrastructure projects.
The carrying amount of the investments in subsidiaries held at cost less impairment as at March 31, 2025 is Rs.31,299.48 lakhs.
|
Our audit procedures included:
• We have evaluated the design and implementation and tested the operating effectiveness of key controls placed around the impairment assessment process of the recoverability of the investments made including the estimation of future cash flows forecasts, the process by which they were produced and discount rates used.
• We have assessed the Company's identification of CGU with reference to the guidance in the applicable Indian accounting standards..
|
|
The Company has investments in subsidiaries which are considered to be associated with significant risk in respect of valuation of such investments. Changes in business environment could also have a significant impact on the valuation of these investments. These investments are carried at cost less any diminution in value of such investments. The investments are examined for impairment at each reporting date..
|
• Assessed the net worth of subsidiaries on the basis of latest available financial statements.
• We focused on the sensitivity in the difference between the estimated value and book values of the projects, where change in assumptions could cause the carrying amount to exceed its estimated present value. We also assessed the historical accuracy of the Company's estimatesestimates
|
|
These investments are unquoted and hence it is difficult to measure the realisable amount of these investments.
The Company performs an annual assessment of its investments in subsidiaries, to identify any indicators of impairment. The recoverable amount of the CGUs which is based on the higher of the value in use or fair value less costs to sell, has been derived from discounted forecast cash flow models.
|
- Comparing the carrying amount of investments with the relevant subsidiaries balance sheet to identify their net assets, being an approximation of their minimum recoverable amount. Instances where the net assets are in excess of their carrying amount and assessed that those subsidiaries have historically been profit-making.
- For the investments where the carrying amount exceeded the net asset value, compare the carrying amount of the investment with the expected value of the business calculated based on discounted cash flows.
|
|
These models use several key assumptions, concerning estimates of future revenue growth and recoveries from claims filed, concession period, operations costs, the discount rate and assessments of the status of the project and cost of complete balance work..
|
• We focused on key assumptions which were most sensitive to the recoverable value of the intangible asset. We also assessed the historical accuracy of the Company's estimates.
We reviewed and assessed the work performed by management's external valuation experts, including the valuation methodology and the key assumptions used. We also assessed the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the experts used by the management in the process of evaluating impairment model..
|
|
Disputed Tax Matters - Refer Note 3(l)
|
|
The Key Audit Matters
|
How the matter was addressed in audit
|
|
Tax litigation exposures have been identified as a key audit matter due to:
• Significance of these amounts.
• Significant judgment and assumptions required by management in assessing the exposure of each case to evaluate whether there is a need to set up a provision and measurement of exposures as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities.
Additionally, the treatment of tax litigation requires significant judgement due to the complexity of the cases and, timescales for resolution.
|
Our audit procedures include the following:
• Obtained understanding and assessed the internal control environment relating to the identification, recognition and measurement of provisions for disputed tax matters.
• Obtained the summary of disputed tax matters from management and assessed management's position through discussions on both the probability of success in significant cases, and the magnitude of any potential loss.
• Read evidence to corroborate management's assessment of the risk profile in respect of tax disputed matters.
• We involved tax specialists to assist us in evaluating tax positions taken by management.
We assessed the disclosures relating to the disputed tax matters as mentioned
in Note 43 of the Standalone Ind AS financial statements..
|
Information Other than the Standalone Financial Statements and Auditor's Report Thereon
The Board of Directors of the Company is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Management Discussion and Analysis, Board's Report including Annexures to Board's Report, Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report and Report on Corporate Governance and Shareholder's information but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditor's report thereon.
Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the course of our audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of the Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Standalone Financial Statements
The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flow of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended, thereof.
This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Standalone financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Board of Directors is also responsible for overseeing the Company's financial reporting process.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SA's will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under Section 143(3X0 of the Act, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures in the standalone financial statements made by the Management.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the standalone financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the standalone financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the standalone financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors'report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the standalone financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable user of the financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the standalone financial statements.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2020 ("the Order"), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the "Annexure A", a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.
2. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, based on our audit, we report that:
( a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of our audit of the aforesaid Standalone Financial Statements.
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.
(c) The standalone balance sheet, the standalone statement of profit and loss (including other comprehensive income), the standalone statement of changes in equity and the standalone statement of cash flows dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Companies, (Indian Accounting Standards) relevant Rules, 2015 as amended, thereof.
(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on March 31,2025 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2025 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.
(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to the standalone financial statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report in "Annexure B". Our report expresses an unmodified on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company's internal financial control with reference to Standalone Financial Statement.
(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, as amended, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations as at March 31,2025 on its financial position in its standalone financial statements - Refer Note 43 to the standalone financial statement;
ii. The Company did not have long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.
iv. (a) The Management has represented to us that, to
the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the notes to the accounts, no in funds (which are material either individually or in aggregate) have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any other person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities ("Intermediaries"), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company ("Ultimate Beneficiaries") or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries
(b) The Management has represented to us that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the notes to the accounts, no funds (which are material either individually or in aggregate) have been received by the Company from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign
entities ("Funding Parties"), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether, directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party ("Ultimate Beneficiaries") or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries; and
(c) Based on our audit procedures performed conducted that have been considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our attention that has caused us to believe that the representation under sub¬ clause (i) and (ii) of Rule 11 (e) as provided under paragraph (a) and (b) above, contain any material misstatement.
v. No dividend has been declared or paid during the year by the Company.
vi. Based on our examination which included test checks, the Company has used an accounting software for maintaining its books of account for the financial year ended March 31, 2025, which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same
has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software. Further, during the course of our audit we did not come across any instance of the audit trail feature being tampered with.
Additionally audit trail for prior years has been preserved by the Company as per statutory requirements for record retention.
3 I n our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us, the remuneration paid / payable by the Company to its directors during the year is in accordance with the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.
For S A R C & Associates
Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No.: 006085N
Kamal Aggarwal
Partner
Place: New Delhi Membership No.: 090129
Date: 30th May, 2025 UDIN: 25090129BMJMFD2570
|